Feedmind
Capability · AI drafts

Drafted from your product data, not invented around your title.

When a page is genuinely thin, something has to write the missing sentence. Feedmind drafts it from that product own attributes, metafields and existing copy, marks what it could not source, and puts the result in the same review queue as everything else.

The problem

Generated copy that invents specifications is worse than no copy.

An assistant quoting a waterproof rating nobody verified is a returns problem and a compliance problem. Drafts are grounded: if the fabric rating is not in your data, the draft leaves a marked gap for you to fill rather than guessing a number.

You see this before anything is generated, and you are charged for drafts produced, not for the ones you reject beforehand.

Estimate before generation
German parity, batch 1240 drafted rewrites
Estimated creditsabout 360 CR
Estimated costabout €7.20
Schema and markupIncluded
RescoreIncluded
How it works

Grounded, estimated, reviewed.

01

Grounded in your own fields

The model receives the product attributes, metafields, variant data and existing copy for that product. It is instructed to write only what those support, and to mark anything it cannot source.

02

Priced before it runs

A batch shows its estimated credits and euro cost before generation. One credit is one product, run once, covering all of its fields and every locale you sell in.

03

Reviewed like any other change

Drafts enter the same queue with before and after. Nothing is published because a model produced it. It is published because you approved it.

04

Rejections are cheap

Reject a batch at the estimate and it costs nothing. Reject an individual draft after generation and it is not published, and not repeated on the next run.

The meter

A normal month barely touches the bundle.

The credits screen reports what a month of spending produced, not only how many units it consumed. Below the meter, the outcomes: products that moved a grade, questions that now have an answer, locales brought level.

FeedmindOverviewProductsFixesRulesInsightsNordvelo
Credits used
312 / 2,000
16 percent · resets 01 Sep
Cost of all that
€6.24
312 credits at €0.02 · 3,806 further fixes included
01142 products moved up at least one grade after a push you approved
0237 buyer questions now have an answer an assistant can quote
03240 German pages brought level with their English source
Credits and usage for August on the Growth plan. Schematic, not a screenshot.
Cost
Credit metered

Drafting is the only capability that spends credits. Every paid plan includes enough credits to run its whole catalog once a month, and the price per credit falls as the plan grows. Rule-based fixes cost nothing on any tier.

What we do not claim

A draft is a draft. We do not claim the copy will convert better or rank higher. We claim it answers questions the previous copy did not, which is what the answerability dimension measures, and we show the score before and after.

See this on your own catalog.

The free check reads a representative sample of your product pages and returns the score in about a minute. No account, no card.